How the Fed Could Inject Liquidity if Long-Term | Bonds & Fixed Income

If long-end bond yields spiral out of control, the Fed may begin injecting liquidity again: a step-by-step information of how it really works.

When a few weeks in the past briefly flirted with the 5% stage, the Fed’s Collins launched an interview stating that ’’the Fed is totally able to stabilize markets’’.

To stabilize the bond market, they might ’’inject liquidity’’ via operations like the LSAP – Large Scale Asset Purchase or QE.

Central Banks create bank reserves after they carry out such operations.

Bank reserves are sometimes called ’’Liquidity’’.

When Central Banks interact in liquidity creation, they try this in the hope that it prompts the so-called Portfolio Rebalancing Effect.

To perceive this, let’s begin from what QE does to the stability sheet of a industrial bank – take a take a look at the chart under.

Following the GFC, regulators pressured banks to own more HQLA (high-quality liquid property) to fulfill depositor outflows.

Bank reserves and bonds qualify as ’’HQLA’’ as they’re liquid enough to be transformed into money to fulfill potential outflows rapidly.

But banks aren’t detached between proudly owning bank reserves and bonds, and particularly if the quantity of reserves grows dramatically as a consequence of QE.

Bank reserves are a zero-duration and low-yielding instrument that may be suboptimal to own in giant sizes, particularly if in contrast with bonds, which offer larger returns and length hedging properties.

And that is when the Portfolio Rebalancing Effect kicks in.

• Once QE begins, Central Banks take away bonds and inject new reserves into the banking system.
• Loaded with suboptimal reserves, banks will attempt to change back the composition of their portfolios in the direction of more bonds.
• They will bid up safer bonds first, and bid up riskier bonds later when the hunt for returns intensifies.

This will kick in a virtuous cycle of low volatility and a hunt for riskier property: the Portfolio Rebalancing Effect in motion.

Summarizing:

1. Central Banks broaden their stability sheet and buy bonds
2. Commercial Banks are on the receiving finish of QE, and therefore their portfolio composition tilts in the direction of more reserves and fewer bonds.
3. But reserves are sub-optimal to own in comparison with regulatory-friendly bonds, and therefore, they give the impression of being to rebalance their portfolios.
4. They begin shopping for the exact same bonds QE is shopping for, therefore suppressing volatility additional and compressing credit spreads.
5. Asset allocators and traders throughout the world are more and more inspired to take further dangers of their portfolios, supporting the move of credit and capital.

Does the Portfolio Rebalancing Effect make sense to you?

Original Post